Wednesday, 13 January 2021

Anarchy of Democracy

US President Mr. Ronald Reagan made a historical speech in the British Parliament on 8-Jun-1982 (https://youtu.be/uCu7-Ka_zbY). It was much before collapse of USSR (1988-91) and Berlin wall (9-Nov-1989). He spoke about strategic arms reduction, reducing risk of war, peace being the universal right of all human beings. He said, “We must take action to assist the campaign for democracy. Foster the infrastructure of democracy, system of free press, union, political parties, universities”. Three NGO’s were established in the USA in 1983 after taking inspiration from this speech viz.

·         National Endowment for Democracy (NED) (https://www.ned.org/) US Congress (USA parliament) directly funds this NGO.

·         International Republican Institute (IRI) (https://www.iri.org/).  IRI is directly funded by NED and controlled by Republican Party.

·         National Democratic Institute (NDI) (https://www.ndi.org/). NDI is directed funded by NED and controlled by Democratic party.

In short, all these NGO’s are directly funded by US Congress and controlled by two principal political parties of the USA. It is interesting to see that IRI and NDI refer to each other as their partners and their websites are very much similar. There is one more NGO which is directly funded by NED i.e. Freedom House (https://freedomhouse.org/). This is a very old NGO but related to this blog.

USSR’s misendeavors in Afghanistan propelled disintegration of the USSR. Post Soviet Union collapse in 1991, Russian influence in the world started waning. As a result, Uncle Sam became the big daddy of the world. USA’s intervention in the international affairs has increased lot more since then. See the websites of these NGO’s. They are directly working in hundreds of countries. One of the ambitious experiment of these NGO’s is ‘Arab Spring’.

On 17-Dec-2010 Mohamed Bouazizi, a fruit vendor in Tunisia, set himself on fire because of torture by one lady police officer. The very next day, the massive protest started in the Tunisian capital. Arab Spring spread from Tunisia to Egypt, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Bahrain and many more middle eastern and north African countries very quickly. The fire of Arab Spring was so strong that the dictators who were ruling for multiple decades started toppling like a castle of playing cards. Figure No: 1 gives a brief information on the events unfolded during Arab Spring.  There are many common things Arab Spring protests in these countries,

·         These countries were ruled by Arab Nationalists and Socialist dictators wherever Arab Spring was partially or completely successful. Although, these are Muslims majority countries, most of these dictators were pro west and not Islamists. They were mix of Arab Nationalist, Socialist and Communist in their ideology.

·         The countries like Tunisia, Egypt, Syria, Libya, Iraq, Yemen were ruled by locally evolved communists and/or socialist political parties. As it happens in all over the world, these countries finally turned into a single political party system.

·         Unknown leaders led the Arab Spring in these countries. The protests were mostly leaderless. The demonstrations were mainly held in the capital cities and another one or two major cities. Majority of the citizens were silent observers. Protesters had only one objective of overthrowing the existing regime. They did not offer any solution after overthrowing the existing regimes.


Figure 1: Arab Spring Important Timeline

·        The regimes used brutal military force to crush the demonstrations. Some demonstrators were killed in govt. action. That gave USA and EU countries an excuse to intervene in these countries.

·        USA and/or European countries supported Tunisian President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi, Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak, Yemen’s Ali Abdulla Saleh and Iraq’s Saddam Hussein some time or other in the past. They supported them by supplying arms and ammunitions and investments in those countries.

·         When these dictators realized that America and Europe were no longer their friends, they vacated their position and ran away. Tunisian President took refuge in Saudi Arabia. Those, who did not get such refuge, were killed by rioters like the President of Libya and Yemen.

·         Most of these countries had very good oil based economies, high per capita income, high human development index, freedom for women, high literacy rate although they were ruled by autocratic dictators.

·       None of these dictators were Islamist in their ideology. Now Islamist groups are prominent in these countries. In fact, Ennahda, the Islamist party in Tunisia, is part of the Tunisian government now. Muslim Brotherhood formed the government in Egypt after Arab Spring.

·       Role of social media such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube in Arab Spring is very interesting. They helped protestors in garnering the international support. Social media platforms transformed local protests into a global protest. Therefore, Arab Spring is also called as the ‘Facebook Revolution’.

·       Few or all of NED, IRI, NDI, Freedom House have their presence in these countries where Arab Spring happened. Interestingly, Egypt government was directly getting donations from NED previously and then distributed to these NGO’s. Subsequently, NED started giving funds to local NGO’s directly. All of these Arab Spring countries blamed these 4 NGO’s for their role in civil unrest in their countries.

      US Department of State organized ‘Alliance of Youth Movement Summit’ in Columbia Law School in Manhattan from 3rd to 5th Dec 2008. The members of 17 NGO’s from 15 countries attended this summit. This summit was sponsored by Facebook, Google, YouTube, MTV, Howcast, Columbia Law School and the State Department. The objectives of this summit was to develop a field manual on how to use digital media to promote freedom and justice, counter violence, extremism and oppression in their countries. Sounds very liberal right! Many from ‘Arab Spring’ countries attended this summit. As I said earlier, it is difficult to find out Arab Spring leaders. But whatever names are available in public domain such as Bashem Fathy from Egypt, Ms. Qadhi from Yemen, Majdi Calboussi from Tunisia, Wael Ghonim from Egypt had attended this summit.

Photo 1: American NGO's Conducting Training

The following map gives the status of countries where Arab Spring happened. Although the following map has been created in 2016, it still holds good in 2021.


Figure 2: Impact of Arab Spring

We need to go into past to understand the reasons that led to Arab Spring. It is also very important to understand Arab Monarchy, Arab Nationalism, Kurds Nationalism, Arab Communism, Arab Socialism, Arab anti-imperialism, Nasserism, Muslim brotherhood, erstwhile Ottoman Empire, and Baath Party (Baathism) to understand the reasons led to Arab Spring. All of them are independent topics in itself. However, I will touch a few of them briefly in this blog.

·         Ottoman empire collapsed in 1923 after World War 1 and various countries were created as per the wishes of British, French etc (winners of WW1). The boundaries of Syria, Iraq, Jordan, and other Arab countries were drawn under Sykes-Picot agreement between French and British. Ethnicity, race and religious sects were completely ignored while forming these countries.

·         Arab Socialism and nationalism promoted by Gamal Abdel Nasser (President of Egypt from 1954 to 1970) is called as Nasserism. Nasserism had pan Arab aspiration. Many leaders across various Arab countries proudly considered themselves as Nasserists.

·         Arab Baath Party is Arab Socialist party founded in Syria on 7-Apr-1947 by Michel Aflaq, a Christian, his childhood friend Salah al-Din-al Bitar, a Sunni Muslim and Al-Arsuzi, an atheist. All of them earlier had romance with Marxism. But they moved to socialism later on due to delusion with Marxism. Arab Unity, Liberty and Socialism were the key principles of Baath Party. They were strong believers of secularism and separation of state and religion. All of them were inspired by Nasserism and wanted to form a single Arab country in Arab region. The party quickly expanded from Syria to Iraq, Jordan, Yemen and Lebanon. Aflaq become its Secretary General (sounds communist right!). Later on, the party split into country wise units in 1966 due to difference of opinion.

Figure 3: Kurds Dominated Area

·      Kurds are mainly Sunni Muslims but they are not Arabs, Turks or Persians. They have their distinct ethnicity, culture and language in Middle East with estimated population over 45 Million. Treaty of Sevres 1920 was signed between Ottoman empire and Allied Forces (UK, France) after Ottoman empire’s defeat in WW1. A separate country was promised to Kurds as per this treaty. But it never materialized. Kurds are distributed in Turkey (20% to 30%), Iraq (15% to 20%), Syria (7% to 10%) and minor presence in Iran and Armenia. Although, Kurds are mainly Sunni Muslims, they are persecuted by Sunni Turkey, Sunni Syria, Shia Iraq and Shia Iran.

Kurds have an autonomous area in Iraq since 1992. They have declared independent state called Rojava in Syria. Their political parties YPG and PKK have been declared as terrorist organizations in Turkey. Kurds have their own army in Syria and Iraq. It is called as Peshmerga. Women are active participants of Peshmerga.

With this long introduction, let me come to the main topic of this blog. How Arab Spring protest whose main objective was to bring freedom, justice, remove corruption, bring real democracy later became a cause of civil war in those countries and a playing field for international forces like America, Europe, Russia, and various Islamic groups? Arab Spring protest spread across 14 to 15 countries in Arab world and North Africa within one year. The story of each of these countries is very painful. But I wish to cover only 2 of these countries here.

Libya:

Libya became Italian colony after a war between Italy and Ottoman empire in 1911-12. Italians killed over 2 lacs Libyans during their rule. Italians gave this name to this region in 1934. After defeat of Italy during World War 2, Libya was occupied by Allied Forces (US, UK, France) from 1943 to 1951. On 24-Dec-1951, Libya declared its independence from British and became constitutional monarchy. King Idris became the first and the last monarch of Libya. Substantial oil reserves were found in 1959 and a poor country became a wealthy state in very short period of time. When King Idris was on vacation in Turkey and Greece in 1969, Muammar Gaddafi took an opportunity and overthrew monarchy in a bloodless coup. Colonel Gaddafi was just 27 years old then. He became the chairman of Revolutionary Command Council (RCC) and de facto head of the state. He had strong control over the administration and military of Libya. He spent oil money on social sector. He provided free education, healthcare and housing to citizens. Libya achieved highest human development index in the Arab world during this period. Child marriage was banned, women enjoyed equality and equal right for divorce and achieved high literacy rate. Once per capita income reached to $14,000.  Although he called himself as Nasserist, sometimes he adopted socialist policies, sometimes communist and sometimes even Islamic policies. He has his own share of idiotic theories of governance. Popular revolution of 1973, Green Book of 1975 and direct democracy and finally stepped down from power in 1997 weakened his control over government. Although, he has provided many social welfare schemes to the citizens, people were fed up of his long rule. He has his share of international conspiracies and support to terrorism.

After success of Arab Spring in Tunisia in Jan 2011 and Egypt in Feb 2011, Libyan Arab Spring started on 15-Feb-2011 in Benghazi as a protest against arrest of Fathi Terbil. Political activist Jamal al Hajji was arrested for call for demonstration. Amnesty International (readers are aware of activities of Amnesty in India and recent news of closure of their operation in India) involvement into this started intervention of foreign NGO into local protest. There were reports that mercenaries from Turkey, Tunisia and Egypt entered into Libya and supported protestors. Soon the protest turned violent. The government used brutal military force to crush the violent demonstrations. There are reports that Qatar supported protestors with money, military training and weapons. The social media platforms helped in organizing these protests. Some of Gaddafi’s ministers deserted him and formed National Transitional Council (NTC) on 27-Feb-2011 along with other politicians and religious leaders. Most of the Libya came under NTC’s control by March-11. On 19-Mar-2011 NATO (US, UK, France, Canada, Turkey etc.) forces started military intervention in Libya under UNSC resolution. The intention was to stop a civil war and civilian killings by Gaddafi. The amount of ammunition dropped on Libya was overwhelming. It destroyed most of the basic infrastructure and major cities of Libya. Such destruction by NATO forces definitely is not in line with their objectives. Meanwhile, NTC forces took over Tripoli (capital of Libya). Gaddafi family fled Tripoli in Aug-2011 and took refuge in Sirte. NTC forces captured him and killed him on 20-Oct-2011. Many of us have seen disturbing visuals of his killing. This ends 42 years of Gaddafi’s rule in Libya.


Figure 4: Who Control What in Libya

It has been more than 9 years after removal of Gaddafi. Libya is still burning under civil war. Lot of things have happened in between. Currently Libya is controlled by three groups.

·       Government of National Accord (GNA) controls area surrounding Tripoli. GNA is UN recognized government of Libya. It has support mainly from UK, France, Turkey, Qatar and other EU countries.  It has its own military and takes support from many local and private militias.

·       Libyan Nation Army (LNA) and House of Representative (HOR) are based out of Tobruk.  LNA is led by Field Marshal Khalifa Haftar. Most of the previous Libyan army, navy and air force is under his control now. LNA is supported by Russia, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Egypt etc.

·       Southern part of Libya is controlled by local terrorist groups, Al-Qaeda, ISIS etc.

All of these three groups are fighting with each other. The Figure 4 explains who controls what. But it changes every day.



Figure 5: Actors in Libyan Civil War

What has been achieved by Libyan Arab Spring and removal of Colonel Gaddafi? Once the prosperous country with very high human development index is now struggling for peace, security, food, education, healthcare, refugee crises. Libya is uniform in sectarian and religion. Libya has over 97% Arab Sunnis. But roots of its civil war lays into its history. Freedom House and Amnesty International had fueled the civil war with the help of social media. Qatar and Turkey support GNA just because Saudi supports LNA. Saudi, Egypt, UAE supports LNA because GNA has elements of Muslim Brotherhood.

Egypt, Saudi, UAE oppose Muslim Brotherhood as they consider Muslim Brotherhood as threat to their government. Ironically, Saudi and UAE support Haftar who is a strong secularist and Nasserist. USA says they do not have any role in Libya. Khalifa Haftar, once a close associate of Colonel Gaddafi, helped Gaddafi in overthrowing monarchy. Animosity between Haftar and Gaddafi cropped up later on and Haftar fled to USA with the help of CIA in 1990. He returned to Libya after killing of Gaddafi. He is a citizen of USA and his children still live there. No one knows when this civil war will end. A common citizen is crying for normal life and cursing themselves why did they remove Gaddafi. Gaddafi may not be the right solution for Libya but what Libyans are currently getting is worse than Gaddafi. Libya is paying a price of silence of majority and curse of oil.

Syria:

Arab Spring movement was already successful in overthrowing the governments in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya in just 2 months. It inspired citizens of other Arab nations. Next in line was Syria. A group of 7 teenage students drew graffiti “it’s your turn doctor” in Daraa city in March 2011. It was direct attack on Dr. Bashar-al-Assad (who is an Ophthalmologist), President of Syria, to vacate his place. Police cracked down these students and put them in jail. Protests erupted for the release of these teenage students. Facebook and Twitter picked up these protests and garnered larger support for these protests. On 20th March, protestors burnt down Baath Party office and attacked the Police. Approximately, 7 policemen and 15 protestors were killed in this riot. Protests spread to other cities such as Homs, Damascus, Aleppo etc.  On 29-Apr-2011, 13-year old boy Hamza-al-Khateeb participated in such protests in Daraa city. He disappeared during the protest. His family received his body after one month. The family accused Assad govt. of his torture and killing whereas govt. says he was killed by the protestors. No one knows the truth. A Facebook page dedicated to him was started. This Facebook page made him an international hero and protestors started getting international support. Assad started cracking down other political leaders, human right activists and students. But civil uprising kept on growing. Sunni soldiers of Syrian army started defecting. They formed Free Syrian Army (FSA) on 29-July-2011 and civil unrest transformed into an arms struggle. Meanwhile, Presidential Elections were held on 3-Jun-2014. Bashar-al-Assad won the election with a huge majority. USA, Europe shamed these elections but Russia, China, Iran welcomed the results. For the last ~10 years, Syria is a big mess. Giving here brief information on the actors in the civil war;


Figure 6: Who Control What in Syria

·         Syria government forces: Government’s armed forces, private civil militia called National Defense Forces of Syrian Christians and Shabiha (Alawite Shia) private army. They are supported by Hezbollah, Iran and Russia. China gives only diplomatic support no logistic support. This is Alawite Shia camp.

·         Free Syrian army (FSA): Defected sunny soldiers of Syrian army. They are supported by Turkey, Qatar and Jordon. Earlier Saudi, USA and EU also supported them.

·         Terrorist groups: Al-Qaeda, Al-Nusra, ISIS are fighting in Syria.

·         Kurds: Syrian Democratic Front (SDF) is fighting for their independence. They have formed independent state Rojava in Northern Syria in 2013. USA was giving them arms and tactical support.

·         Turkey: Turkey is attacking Syria in the north for creating a buffer zone between Syria and Turkey so that Kurds separatists in Turkey does not get support from Kurds from Iraq and Syria.


Figure 7: Actors in Syrian Civil War

Although Figure 6 shows who controls what in Syria, it changes every day. After Russians help to Syrian, Assad govt. controls major part of Syria. Actors and supporters are changing every moment. USA, Saudi and EU supported FSA but they have stopped it. USA supported Kurds. But they have withdrawn now due to the pressure from Turkey. Syrian govt. forces were fighting with Kurds (SDF). But when Turkey started attacking Kurds, Syria govt. forces supported Kurds. Saudi Arabia is supporting FSA as well as ISIS. Turkey is supporting FSA as well as fighting with Kurds directly. See figure 7.

The reason for this mess lays in history of Syria. France and British divided territories of Ottoman empire under Sykes-Picot agreement after World War 1. France controlled Syria whereas British controlled Iraq. Syria is Sunni majority country with ~80% population Sunni (7% to 10% are Sunni Kurds and remaining Arab), ~10% Alawite Shia and remaining ~10% are Syrian Christians. Syria got its independence from France in 1944. Syria was under political instability from 1944 to 56. Baath party started gaining support in Syria and become the second largest political party in 1954. Syria merged with Egypt in 1958 and combined short lived United Arab Republic (UAR) was born. Egypt’s president Nasser put pressure on Michel Aflaq to dissolve Baath Party. But UAR split in Sept 1961 and Syria became an independent state once again. Baath party took control of Syria in a bloodless coup on 8-Mar-1963. Since then Syria is under Baathist control. Mistrust, purging/killing of opponent, coup are characteristics of any socialist or communist nation. Baath party is a combination of them. Hafez-al-Assad, Alawite Shia, purged all his opponents in Baath party and became the president of Syria in 1970. It was expected that he will transfer his power to a Sunni leader Abdul Halim Khaddam. But Abdul Halim Khaddam helped in fulfilling Hafez’s succession dream and made Hafez’s son Bashar-al-Assad the president of Syria in July 2000. He is the president of Syria since then.

The civil war started with Arab Spring is still going on in Iraq and Yemen. Iraq’s history is also similar to Syria. Iraq was created under Sykes-Picot agreement and controlled by British. Iraq was also under Baath party’s and de facto Saddam Hussein’s control since 1963. Syria is a Sunni majority country but controlled by Alawite Shia. Whereas Iraq is a Shia majority country but was controlled by Saddam, a Sunni Muslim, during Baath party’s regime. Although Baath party government in Iraq and Syria were ruthless, single party autocratic rule, it appears that they were successful in separating state and religion. Saddam Hussein’s Prime Minister was Tariq Aziz, a Christian, till end of Saddam’s regime. When Michel Aflaq was expelled by Syrian Baath party, Saddam Hussein made him Secretary General of Iraqi Baath Party in 1989. Aflaq remained Secretary General of Iraqi Baath party till his death. Today, Iraqi government is mostly controlled by Shia Muslims. Irony is that it is supported both by Iran and USA. Iraqi govt. forces are fighting with ISIS which is mostly comprising of Sunni Muslims and supporters of Saddam Hussein. Saudi and Qatar are supporting ISIS. Once Yemen was socialist country and now destroyed in sectarian war fueled by Arab Spring movement. The civil war in Yemen is also between Shia and Sunni sects of Muslims. Iran is supporting Shia group and Saudi, UAE and Qatar are supporting Sunni.      

In my previous blog, I had written how Islamic world is leading towards three camps, Sunni Islamic monarchy under the leadership of Saudi Arabia, Sunni Political Islam under the leadership of Turkey and Shia Islamic camp under the leadership of Iran. They have been fighting for their supremacy not on their own land but on other’s land. The current civil war in Iraq, Syria, Libya and Yemen where they are actually fighting with each other through their proxies. USA, Russia, France, UK and Israel are supporting Shia in some countries and supporting Sunni in others.

USA wants to teach democracy to the world. Their cultural platform is based on One God, One Prophet, One Book. Ironically they are trying to teach democracy to those people whose cultural platform is also based on One God, One Prophet, One Book. Any democracy lover would not support Gaddafi, Assad, Saleh or Saddam. They had tortured their own citizens for keeping the country together. What USA and European countries have achieved by removing them? Democracy could not be installed in those countries. Most of these countries fell into Islamist’s hands. A common citizen is fighting for survival every day. Basic infrastructure is completely destroyed in civil war. Education, security, livelihood, healthcare, women and children safety deteriorated abysmally low. Child mortality rate is unacceptably high. Peace, security and prosperity of these countries is a distant dream now. Fortunately, USA had to taste anarchy of democracy in the last week. Facebook, Twitter, Google have shown what they can do with President of USA. Let’s hope Americans learn from it. Readers can draw a parallel between Arab Spring and agitations in India. Arvind Kejriwal’s India against corruption and Lokpal agitation stared in April-2011 exactly same time when Arab Spring started in Arab world. Who funded Kejriwal’s agitation is in public domain. Readers can find resemblance in recent anti CAA, NRC agitation and current anti-Farm Bill agitation with Arab Spring. The only difference with India is that India is a vibrant democracy and Indian political class has shown tremendous maturity in handling these agitations. However, silent majority of India has a larger responsibility in the near future! Are you ready?

Satish Gundawar 
14-Jan-2011 


https://www.newsbharati.com/Encyc/2021/1/13/Democracy.html

Thursday, 10 December 2020

One Nation One Election (ONOE)


On 26-Nov-20, Prime Minister Mr. Narendra Modi addressed 80th All India Presiding Officers Conference on Constitution Day. He once again reiterated his desire that India should go to ‘One Nation One Election’ (ONOE) way. After experiencing his govt. last 6 years, he has almost done/implemented whatever he said or hinted. Therefore, it is safe to assume that ONOE can be next big ticket reform in Mr. Modi’s list. Therefore, I thought of putting down my own thoughts as a citizen of India.

In fact, Mr. Modi had talked about it in his first term. Many thought that it could be a reality in 2019 general election. But, we know it didn’t happen for many unknown reasons. Has Mr. Modi invented this idea? Is he the only one who is promoting it? Answer to both questions is NO. India has seen and experienced simultaneous General and State Assembly elections before. The first general election and state assembly elections were conducted simultaneously in 1951/52 after independence and acceptance of Constitution of India. The simultaneous elections continued in 1957, 1962 and 1967. It first broke after 1967 election when Mrs. Indira Gandhi (then Prime Minister) was dismissed from the Congress Party due feud within the Congress party. Loksabha was dissolved in Dec 1970. The fresh elections were conducted in March 1971. Mrs. Indira Gandhi imposed emergency in the country in 1975. As a result, 5th Loksabha continued for almost for 6 years. We saw 5 general elections from 1989 to 1999. Multiple dismissal of state assemblies since 1967 further broke simultaneous elections. Today, India is in continuous election mode.  However, currently there are 4 states (viz. Orissa, Andhra Pradesh, Sikkim and Arunachal Pradesh) where state assembly elections are held along with the general election.  

Dr. S. Y. Quarishi (former Chief Election Commissioner) noted that “elections are polarizing events which have accentuated casteism, communalism, corruption and crony capitalism. If the country is perpetually on election mode, there is no respite from these evils. Holding simultaneous elections would certainly help in this context” The Law Commission of India headed by Hon’ble Justice B. P. Jeevan Reddy in its 170th report on Reform of Electoral Laws (1999) stated “This cycle of elections every year, and in the out of season, should be put an end to. We must go back to the situation where the elections to Loksabha and all the Legislative Assemblies are held at once.”  Hon. Vice President Mr. Venkaiah Naidu has advocated simultaneous elections in past. Mr. Bibek Debroy (Member of Niti Aayog) and Mr. Kishor Desai (Office of Special Duty, Niti Aayog) have published an essay on this topic in Jan-17. I have read all these scholarly articles and many other scholarly articles written by law students across the India on this topic. However, many of the points/suggestions in this blog are my own. But I do not claim that they are not suggested by others. However, I have not read them in public forum.

My view is that the term “One Nation One Election” (ONOE) should be further expanded to “One Nation One Election from Panchayat to Parliament” (ONOEP2P). It means that elections of Panchayat, State Assembly and Loksabha should be conducted simultaneously. This is a huge electoral reform and would need huge modifications to Constitution of India and many prevailing laws of land. But we should dream big. We are the largest democracy in the world and we should lead from the front. India has experience of democracy and conducting free and fair elections over 70 years. It is high time that we should transitioned to Democracy 2.0 now. I am trying to articulate What, When, Why, Where and Why of this topics in the next sections.

The Objective of “One Nation One Election from Panchayat to Parliament”

The following should be the objectives of ONOE I think.  

·         100% Voting: The voting percentage is increasing day by day. But it has reached to ~60% till now. A vibrant democracy should dream of near 100% voting. If all the voters are not voting or not able to vote due to many reasons, then it is violation of fundamental right of the citizens. All the impediments should be removed in achieving this. This is should be the main objective of ONOE.

·         Accurate Voter List: The current voter list is completely flawed. Large number of names are either missing or names are added fraudulently. The voter list should be ~100% accurate so that no citizen is deprived from voting.

·         Free and fair election with ~0 electoral malpractices.

·         Reduction of Election Expenses: The election commission report and law commission reports have indicated that elections are becoming one of the major reason for black money generation and corruption. Loksabha candidate can spend Rs. 70 lacs whereas state assembly candidate can spend Rs. 28 lacs. However, there is no prescribed limit for political parties on election expenses. The report says that the total cost of 2014 general election was Rs. 30,000 crores. It increased to Rs. 55,000 crores in 2019. If we add state assembly election expenses, then it would be multifold. If elections from Panchayat to Parliament are held together, the election expenses can be capped to some amount for Panchayat, state assembly and Loksabha for one registered political party than a candidate.

·         Reduced security risk: Security personnel are deployed on election duty around the year. They will get more time for performing their main duties, if ONOE is implemented.

·         Stability of Governance: Govt. will get complete 5 years to run the govt. effectively and efficiently.

Reasons for Continuous Elections:

India has seen simultaneous elections from 1951/52 to till 1967 (4 times). Over 70 years. India has seen almost all the reasons of disruption of standard term of Loksabha or State Assembly of 5 Years.

·         Hung parliament or state assembly as people did not given clear majority to any political party or political alliance.

·         Imposition of President’s rule under Article 356 and its misuse.

·         Imposition of emergency under Article 352 and its misuse.

·         Central or state government loses the majority or confidence of the house.

·         No confidence motion against central (under Loksabha rule 198) or state govt. is successful.

·         Chief Minister advises Governor to dissolve the house under Article 172 (2) (b).

·         Prime Minister advises President of India to dissolve Loksabha under Article 85 (2) (b).

Misuse of article 356 and 352 can be curtailed by putting additional checks and balances in the law. But all the above scenarios will/can happen in future as well. Dismissing central or state govt. need not be incorrect at all the time. It can be done in the interest of nation as well.

Advantages and Disadvantages of ONOE:

Advantages and disadvantages of ONOE are being discussed, shared by many eminent people and they are also available in public forum. I am just collating them here. I may agree or disagree with few of them.

Advantages:

·         Reduction of Election expenses: Election commission had spent Rs. 3,870 crores in 2014 for general election alone. Total election expenses were Rs. 55,000 crores in 2019 general election as per few reports. If ONOE is implemented, total election expenses will reduce drastically. 

·         Speedy Decision Making: Govt. hesitates to take tough decisions in time as some or other election is at the corner. Some decisions are delayed or hastened to avoid impact on election or to help election. ONOE will remove such inhibition and govt. will take decisions appropriately.

·         Speedy Development Work: Continuous elections and imposition of model code of conduct put spanner into development work. This will be completely stopped after implementation of ONOE.

·         Enhanced Security: Security personnel will be deployed for election duty only once in 5 years. They will get more time to perform their main duties.

·         Reduction in Black Money: Huge black money is generated for elections. Since some election or other is always there in some part of country. Black money generation for election is continuously generated. If election expenses are reduced and election are held simultaneous, black money generation will be reduced. It will reduce the corruption as well.

·         Improved Governance: Each state goes through 3 cycles of election. Government’s administration is completely busy in election duties at least for 3 months for each election. It means, govt. administration is busy in 9 to 10 months in total 60 months i.e. ~17% efforts are spent only on election. If election is held only once in 5 years, they will be busy only for 3 months which is just 5%. It will improve the governance.  

Disadvantages:

·         Noncompetitive Environment: Since election are happening continuously somewhere in the country, political parties have to show performance continuously. If elections are held every 5 years, political parties will not work for first 4 years and work only in last 1 year which will be on top of people’s mind. In short, it will impact on development work.

·         Sidelining of Local Issues: National issues will overpower local issues. Local issues will not impact on the outcome of local elections.

·         Elimination of Regional Parties: National parties will have advantage in ONOE. Regional parties will be slowly marginalized and eventually diminished/marginalized.

One Nation One Election:

Let’s assume govt decides to start ONOE from 2024 (next General Election), then the following things must be done before that,

·         There would be few state assemblies which term need to be extended beyond 5 years.

·         Some of the state assemblies need to be dissolved before completing 5-year term.

·         Article 83(2) gives the term of Loksabha and Article 172 (10) gives the term of state assembly. Today it is not fixed and hence new term of 5 years starts from any election (general or state assembly). Term of Loksabha, State Assembly and Panchayat should be fixed to 5 years. After abolition of Article 370 in State of Jammu and Kashmir where term was 6 years during Article 370 era. Now it should be simpler.

·         Anti-defection law has made it difficult to dislodge majority govt. but opposition parties are still using a tool of No-Confidence motion. Look at the example of no confidence motion moved against Mr. Narendra Modi in Jul 2018. No Confidence motion (against present govt.) should be backed by Confidence motion (for new govt.). Both of them should be approved by house at the same time. This will reduce the misuse of no confidence motion by opposition parties and will help in stabilizing the govt.

·         Panchayat election is a state subject and managed by State Election Commission. Election Commission of India does not have any say in that. Article 324 needs to be change to accommodate this.

·         Reason for continuous has been given above. Constitutional amendment in those article should be taken to minimize those events.

It is important to see state assembly elections schedule in a glance with reference to next 2024 General Election would be conducted somewhere April to June 2024. This view will help in selecting the right window for enacting a new law of ONOE

Year 2021

Year 2022

Year 2023

Year 2024

Year 2025

J&K (Mar)

Uttarakhand (Mar)

Himachal (Jan)

Rajasthan (Jan)

Jharkhand (Jan)

West Bengal (Jun)

Punjab (Mar)

Gujarat (Jan)

MP (Jan)

New Delhi (Jan)

Kerala (Jun)

Goa (Mar)

Nagaland (Mar)

Chhattisgarh (Jan)

Bihar (Nov)

Tamilnadu (Jun)

Manipur (Mar)

Tripura (Mar)

AP (Jun)

 

Pondicherry (Jun)

Uttar Pradesh (May)

Meghalaya (Mar)

Orissa (Jun)

 

Assam (Jun)

 

Karnataka (May)

Arunachal (Jun)

 

 

 

Mizoram (Dec)

Sikkim (Jun)

 

 

 

Telangana (Dec)

Haryana (Nov)

 

 

 

 

Maharashtra (Nov)

 


Note: Red marked states where assembly election will be conducted along with General Election. Months given in the above table are approximate. It can vary by few days in either direction.

Scenarios 1:

If new law of ONOE is passed before March-22, then 16 state assemblies can be given extension ranging from 3 months to 25 months, whereas 11 state and UT assemblies will have to be dissolved before 5 months to 1 year before completing complete 5 years.  

Scenarios 2:

If new law is passed in Jun to Dec-22, then 11 state assemblies can be given extension ranging from 3 months to 15 months whereas 16 state and UT assemblies will have to be dissolved before 5 months to 34 months before completing complete 5 years.

States, where assembly duration is being extended, may not have any objections. But States, where assembly is being dissolve before 5 years, will have objection / reservation. The Constitutional experts would say that extension beyond 6 months is not healthy for parliamentary democracy. Same may hold true for dissolution of state assembly. However, there will have to be one-time special consideration in order to start ONOE.

My Solution: National Government:

Dismissal of any state or central govt., President’s rule, hung parliament or state assembly and imposition of emergency are very much possibilities in future and can’t be avoided. Such events will disrupt ONOE in future. Therefore, some new constitutional arrangement should be made to address these cases. If ONOE has to start in 2024, one-time extension or dissolution of state assembly will be necessary. To address these scenarios, I am suggesting National Govt. It should be formed in a state or at the center in the following scenario,

·         Hung parliament or state assembly as voters did not given clear majority to any political party or political alliance in the election.

·         Central or state government loses the majority in the house and remaining term is more than 1 year.

·         Central or state government loses in no-confidence motion, new govt. formation is impossible and remaining term is more than 1 year.

·         Prime Minister or Chief Minister recommends dissolution of house and remaining term is more than 1 year.   

·         One-time term extension to any state govt. during passing of ‘One Nation One Election’ law.  (In Scenario 1, 16 state assemblies would be extended beyond 5 years). Such extensions are not good in any matured democracies and hence it should be look as one-time exception. 

Basic Principles of National Govt.:

As name suggest, it would not be a government of any political party or alliance. It would be people’s govt. and hence should be called as National Govt. We have seen such government from 1947 to 1951/52. Pandit Nehru led that govt. in the center. But this National Govt. will be different than that.

·         Prime Minister/Chief Minister would be from single largest party or pre-poll political alliance. The political party or alliance should give their choice of Prime Minister/Chief Minister to Hon. President of India / State Governor. Hon. President of India or State Governor will not have any say in the suggested candidate.  

·         Leader of opposition will be decided by second largest political party or pre-poll alliance. The political party or alliance should give their choice of leader of opposition to Hon. President of India/State Governor. Hon. President of India or State Governor will not have any say in suggesting leader of opposition.

·         Open ballot or secret ballot (based on what Constitution of India allows) voting should be done for speaker of Loksabha or president of state assembly.

·         Hon. President of India or State Governor will decide the size of ministry as per prevailing rules. They will distribute the number of ministers exactly as per percentage of MP or MLA each political party or pre-poll political alliance have won in the election or have in the current house.

·         State Governor, nominated Chief Minister, President of political parties will jointly decide the portfolio distribution of state council of ministry. If there is no agreement on portfolio, then Governor’s decision will be final.

·         President of India, nominated Prime Minister and President of political parties will jointly decide the portfolio distribution of council of ministry. It there is no agreement on portfolio, then President’s decision will be final.

·         The Chief Minister and Prime Minister should be enabled/Strengthened so that he/she can run the govt. effectively and he/she gets proper support from ministers from other political parties.

If remainder tenure of Loksabha or State Assembly is less than 1 year. Then President of India will decide whether he/she would recommend forming a National Government or impose President’s rule in the center or any state. If he/she chooses to impose President rules, then he/she will form a council of minister of his/her choice. He/she can give such freedom to governor to select council of ministry or select council of ministry himself/herself in the state in consultation with cabinet.

If all the above efforts for avoiding fresh election are failed, remainder tenure of Loksabha or state assembly is more than 18 months, the cabinet recommends for dissolution of Loksabha or state assembly, then fresh election should be conducted. However, the new govt. will be formed only for remaining tenure. In short, if the previous govt. fails after completing 3 years, the new elected govt. tenure will only for 2 years. This holds true for state or center. 

Criticism:

Implementation of ONOE is huge constitutional activity. Therefore, its criticism is very obvious and understandable. INC, TMC, CPI, NCP, AIMIM have already registered their opposition to this idea to Election Commission of India. There are many people who have opposed this idea.


Criticism

My Response

ONOE will need huge constitutional amendments. Many Articles of Constitution need to be changed. The real benefits can’t be quantified for ONOE.

It is indeed a huge constitutional amendment. But cost saving, impact on development work can be approximately calculated.

The current systems where elections are held continuously have not impacted on democracy of India or not created any constitutional issue. The difference between disadvantages of current system and advantages of ONOE are not justifiable

This is typical mentality of status quo, why to change, who will take the responsibility of its failure. I think we need to get out of such thinking. New experiments, innovation, improvements in laws, processes must be done in democracy. We are the largest and vibrant democracy in the world. We need to lead by example.

Voters will vote similarly in all 3 elections and it will give advantage to national parties.

Some report says that 77% voters will vote to the same party, if elections are held simultaneously. Whereas 61% voters will vote to the same party, if elections are held separately. There are 31 instances of simultaneous elections since 1989. Voters selected the same party in 24 times and they chose different party 7 times. I think statistics does not prove this point. In fact, it proves that voters are wisely voting. We should trust the judgment of votes. I think Indian votes are more matured now. I had written a blog (Click on it) on it previously. Look at General election in 2019. Orissa elected Naveen Patnaik and Andhra Pradesh elected Y. S. Jaganmohan Reddy as Chief Minister during Modi wave.

National issues will overpower local issues.

Again this is showing no confidence on wisdom of voters. Voters defeated BJP in Rajasthan, MP and Chhattisgarh state assembly election in Jan 2019. The same voters defeated Congress in general election in May 2019 completely. Same thing happened in New Delhi election in Feb 2020. These elections very clearly shows that voters are wise enough to choose and vote differently, if they think so.

ONOE election will help only to national parties. Regional parties will have disadvantage and they will be marginalized in future

The data does not support this claim. On the contrary, the data given above defeats this claim. However, my personal view is that we have too many political parties in India. We should have lesser numbers of political parties.

ONOE will be not be successful, if we continue with the current set of conditions, system and processes. India should think about comprehensive electoral reforms along with “One Nation One Election from Panchayat to Parliament”. The following are my suggestions for electoral reforms.

Electoral Reforms:

Electoral Reforms

Benefits

The current process of preparing voters list needs to be completely overhauled. It should be made automatic using Aadhar Card or Citizen’s card. Vote list should be completely digital and human intervention in preparing it should be completely stopped.

Each eligible citizen’s name should appear in the voter list based on the address given in his/her Aadhar card.

·         Incidence of voter name missing will be eliminated.

·         Accurate voter list will help in increasing the voting percentage. It will reflect correct people’s mandate.  

·         Eliminates bogus voting

Modification of constituency should be done online and automatic. Aadhar based OTP validation can be implemented for modification of constituency.

·         Students, bachelor employees move their locations very frequently. Their Aadhar card will have address of their native place. They should be able to vote wherever they are currently.

·         Senior citizens frequently visit their children in different cities. They will be able to vote if they are visiting their children.

Right to recall should be implemented. Many countries have right to recall law. It has been used for destabilization also. However, it does not mean that it is wrong. Therefore, citizen should have right to recall their elected members who is incapable, corrupt or criminal

·         Elected MLA and MP will have constant pressure of performing.

Role of technology should be enhanced in election and electoral practices. Election should become more and more digital and paperless. The current Corona Pandemic has given the biggest challenge to democratic elections. Use of technology can prove effective in conducting election during pandemic

Internet and mobile phone has reached to almost every household today. Elderly citizen, differently challenged citizen, hospitalized patients and other category govt deemed fit should be allowed to vote online on the voting day

·         Increase in voting percentage

·         Simplification of electoral practices

·         Reduction of manual work

·         Paperless election

·         Hospitalized patients, immobilized senior citizen will be able to exercise their right to vote.

·         Security personnel, officers of election duty will be able to vote online.

Many countries have provisions of penalizing voters if they don’t vote. However, we should motivate, give incentive to citizen for voting e.g. employed people can get some discount in property tax or income tax, students can get discount in tuition fees etc. lucky draw for voters to increase curiosity. 

·         Increase in voting percentage.

Many states have Legislative Councils. But few states do not have it. MLC election has become the source of political corruption. Article 169 should be completely abolished.

·         Political corruptions will reduce

NOTA rules are very vague. They should be strengthened.

·         It will serve the purpose of NOTA


My Take:

Although it is huge constitutional change to onboard ONOE journey, it should be done. Govt should declare the calendar of steps towards ONOE immediately. We should get rid of the mentality of why change, status quo and select the path of innovation, new ideas, new experiments to improve democracy. The required amendments should be completed before March-22 so that ONOE will be a reality from 2024 general election. The Electoral reforms should be done before 2024 general election. Our current experience of CAA, Agricultural reforms, opposition parties will certainly oppose such reform for sake of opposing it. Therefore, all the stakeholder should be brought together. Awareness within citizen should be encouraged. Govt must arrange conferences in various cities on this subject. Citizen should actively take part in these conferences. This will help in shaping people’s opinion. Once society forms their opinion in favor of ONOE, political parties will fall in line.


Satish Gundawar

10-Dec-2020


References:

https://niti.gov.in/writereaddata/files/document_publication/Note%20on%20Simultaneous%20Elections.pdf

https://adrindia.org/content/discussion-%E2%80%9Csimultaneous-elections-%E2%80%93-possibilities-and-challenges%E2%80%9D-26th-oct-wednesday

https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/Breaking-out-of-election-mode/article15422727.ece